Roxane Vaisemberg vs Naomi Totka Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W W W W L
Form
L W W W W L L W L LHead-2-Head: Vaisemberg 1 - 0 Totka
They have played 3 sets in total, with Vaisemberg winning 2 and Totka winning 1. The last match between Vaisemberg and Totka was at the Sao Paulo, 22-04-2013, First, Clay with Roxane Vaisemberg getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Roxane Vaisemberg | 1 |
| Naomi Totka | 0 |
Sao Paulo(22-04-2013)
4
6
6
1
6
0
| Vaisemberg | Stats | Totka |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 236 | Highest Rank | 363 |
| 35 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 14 | Titles | 2 |
| 68% (202-95) | Career Total W/L | 53% (175-153) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Zandschulp VS Struff PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Vaisemberg VS Totka H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 6-0 | |||||
Vaisemberg VS Totka H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Roxane Vaisemberg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| F | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Maria Irigoyen
Player
Roxane Vaisemberg
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Naomi Totka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoria Morvayova
Player
Naomi Totka
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nina Stadler
Player
Naomi Totka
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
15 of
25)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
15 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
35
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Totka
Player
Laura Sainsbury
51%
(
54 of
106)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
14
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
42%
(
22 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
48%
(
51 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Pribylova
Player
Naomi Totka
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chanel Simmonds
Player
Naomi Totka
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Naomi Totka
Player
Leonie Kung
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naomi Totka
Player
Anastasia Pribylova
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
6-0 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Totka
Player
Alicia Barnett
60%
(
75 of
126)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
128)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
13
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
51 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
128)
130
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Totka
Player
Fiona Codino
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Georgina Garcia-Perez
Player
Naomi Totka
40%
(
23 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68% (202/95) | Win/Loss | 53% (175/153) |
| 65% (430/235) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (385/336) |
| 58% (3331/2443) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3251/3036) |
| 65% (62/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (114/99) |
| 71% (136/55) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (55/47) |
| 36% (4/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (6/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1 | Aces Total | 201 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 425 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 539.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 532.78 |
| 70% (92/131) | 1st Serve % | 62% (4376/7028) |
| 48% (44/92) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2731/4376) |
| 46% (18/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1170/2652) |
| 50% (7/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (442/903) |
| 42% (56/134) | Return Points Win % | 46% (3251/7106) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (2/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (81/62) | Challenger W/L | 38% (18/29) |
| 82% (119/27) | Futures W/L | 56% (157/124) |
| 68% (196/289) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (172/321) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (28/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (23/41) |
| 60% (44/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (33/70) |
| 90% (201/181) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (184/159) |
| 10% (201/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (184/25) |
| 21% (96/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (144/15) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
